Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MLVGX
FWWMX vs MLVGX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MLVGX
FWWMX vs MLVGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. MLVGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and MLVGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MLVGX (309M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MLVGX: FWWMX (1.41) vs MLVGX (0.07). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MLVGX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MLVGX (13 years). MLVGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MLVGX (23.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLVGX: FWWMX (250) vs MLVGX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. MLVGX (-7.24). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MLVGX (-15.68).
| FWWMX | MLVGX | FWWMX / MLVGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.64 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.68 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 5.722 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 309M | 70,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.07 | 2,082% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -7.24 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 1.37 | 2,204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -15.68 | -192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers