Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MLVPX
FWWMX vs MLVPX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MLVPX
FWWMX vs MLVPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. MLVPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and MLVPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MLVPX (309M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MLVPX: FWWMX (1.41) vs MLVPX (0.66). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MLVPX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MLVPX (13 years). MLVPX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. MLVPX (23.00). MLVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: MLVPX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. MLVPX (-6.41). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MLVPX (-11.97).
| FWWMX | MLVPX | FWWMX / MLVPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.93 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 6.223 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 309M | 70,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.66 | 214% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -6.41 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 4.06 | 745% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -11.97 | -252% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers