Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MRGCX
FWWMX vs MRGCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MRGCX
FWWMX vs MRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. MRGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and MRGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MRGCX (6.38B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MRGCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs MRGCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MRGCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MRGCX (30 years). MRGCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). MRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRGCX: FWWMX (250) vs MRGCX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. MRGCX (-6.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MRGCX (2.43).
| FWWMX | MRGCX | FWWMX / MRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.63 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.64 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 8.734 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.38B | 3,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -6.09 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 18.91 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 2.43 | 1,239% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement