Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs MRGHX
FWWMX vs MRGHX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs MRGHX
FWWMX vs MRGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. MRGHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and MRGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MRGHX (6.38B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than MRGHX: FWWMX (1.41) vs MRGHX (0.29). FWWMX was incepted earlier than MRGHX: FWWMX (6 years) vs MRGHX (21 years). MRGHX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). MRGHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). MRGHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: MRGHX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. MRGHX (-2.21). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MRGHX (14.42).
| FWWMX | MRGHX | FWWMX / MRGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 9.290 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.38B | 3,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.29 | 482% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -2.21 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 28.32 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 14.42 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 118.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers