Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NBSLX
FWWMX vs NBSLX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NBSLX
FWWMX vs NBSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NBSLX (4.82B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NBSLX: FWWMX (1.44) vs NBSLX (0.02). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NBSLX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NBSLX (19 years). NBSLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSLX (10.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSLX: FWWMX (250) vs NBSLX (1000000). NBSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.31 vs. FWWMX (5.76). NBSLX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. FWWMX (30.81).
| FWWMX | NBSLX | FWWMX / NBSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.69 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.69 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 16.324 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.82B | 4,546% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.02 | 7,515% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 26.31 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 61.47 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 35.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PIEQX | 22.03 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price International Eq Index | |||
| TCMPX | 19.23 | N/A | N/A |
| AMG TimesSquare International SmallCap N | |||
| CAVYX | 18.53 | N/A | N/A |
| SEI Catholic Values Equity Y (SCVT) | |||
| PRUFX | 112.35 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I | |||
| JPVRX | 22.71 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Developed International ValueR5 | |||