Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NBSRX
FWWMX vs NBSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NBSRX
FWWMX vs NBSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSRX (4.75B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NBSRX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NBSRX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NBSRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NBSRX (32 years). NBSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSRX (10.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSRX: FWWMX (250) vs NBSRX (1000). NBSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. FWWMX (8.15). NBSRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.59 vs. FWWMX (30.36).
| FWWMX | NBSRX | FWWMX / NBSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.86 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.86 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 14.503 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.75B | 4,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 29.57 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 63.89 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 36.59 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement