Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NBSTX
FWWMX vs NBSTX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NBSTX
FWWMX vs NBSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NBSTX (4.25B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NBSTX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NBSTX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NBSTX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NBSTX (29 years). NBSTX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSTX (10.00). NBSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: NBSTX (0) vs FWWMX (250). NBSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.65 vs. FWWMX (8.11). NBSTX return over 5 years is better than : 31.16 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | NBSTX | FWWMX / NBSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 11.113 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.25B | 5,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 24.65 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 60.09 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 31.16 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement