Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NBSTX
FWWMX vs NBSTX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NBSTX
FWWMX vs NBSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NBSTX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and NBSTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSTX (4.72B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NBSTX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NBSTX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NBSTX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NBSTX (30 years). NBSTX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NBSTX (10.00). NBSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: NBSTX (0) vs FWWMX (250). NBSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.84 vs. FWWMX (6.72). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.28 vs. NBSTX (28.35).
| FWWMX | NBSTX | FWWMX / NBSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.453 | 14.644 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.72B | 4,620% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 20.84 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.76 | 57.42 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.28 | 28.35 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers