Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NBSTX
FWWMX vs NBSTX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NBSTX
FWWMX vs NBSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSTX (4.82B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NBSTX: FWWMX (1.44) vs NBSTX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NBSTX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NBSTX (29 years). NBSTX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSTX (10.00). NBSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: NBSTX (0) vs FWWMX (250). NBSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.65 vs. FWWMX (6.69). NBSTX return over 5 years is better than : 33.20 vs. FWWMX (30.69).
| FWWMX | NBSTX | FWWMX / NBSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.04 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.980 | 16.078 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.82B | 4,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.69 | 25.65 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.65 | 61.50 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.69 | 33.20 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers