Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NMUAX
FWWMX vs NMUAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NMUAX
FWWMX vs NMUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NMUAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NMUAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NMUAX (246M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NMUAX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NMUAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NMUAX (17 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUAX: FWWMX (250) vs NMUAX (1000). NMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NMUAX (-32.38).
| FWWMX | NMUAX | FWWMX / NMUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 6.110 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 246M | 88,618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.57 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 22.93 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -32.38 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -21.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers