Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NMUAX
FWWMX vs NMUAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NMUAX
FWWMX vs NMUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NMUAX (249M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NMUAX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NMUAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NMUAX (17 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUAX: FWWMX (250) vs NMUAX (1000). NMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.24 vs. FWWMX (8.15). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. NMUAX (-29.26).
| FWWMX | NMUAX | FWWMX / NMUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 4.733 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 249M | 87,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 16.24 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 22.43 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | -29.26 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -16.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSPQX | 19.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium C | |||
| HLMOX | 9.38 | N/A | N/A |
| Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv | |||
| BIRIX | 26.52 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Sust Awr Advtg Lg Cp Cr Instl | |||
| GSIQX | 22.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R | |||
| GABPX | 54.18 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income P | |||