Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NMUAX
FWWMX vs NMUAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NMUAX
FWWMX vs NMUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NMUAX (252M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NMUAX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NMUAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NMUAX (16 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUAX: FWWMX (250) vs NMUAX (1000). NMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.02 vs. FWWMX (8.11). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. NMUAX (-28.49).
| FWWMX | NMUAX | FWWMX / NMUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 5.938 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 252M | 84,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 18.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 24.85 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | -28.49 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -19.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers