Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NMUCX
FWWMX vs NMUCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NMUCX
FWWMX vs NMUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NMUCX (252M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NMUCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NMUCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NMUCX (16 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: FWWMX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.79 vs. FWWMX (7.93). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.25 vs. NMUCX (-33.53).
| FWWMX | NMUCX | FWWMX / NMUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.00 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.00 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.987 | 5.587 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 252M | 84,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.93 | 16.79 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.63 | 20.51 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.25 | -33.53 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -27.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers