Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NMUCX
FWWMX vs NMUCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NMUCX
FWWMX vs NMUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NMUCX (248M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: FWWMX (1.44) vs NMUCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NMUCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NMUCX (17 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NMUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: FWWMX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. FWWMX (5.41). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.07 vs. NMUCX (-35.76).
| FWWMX | NMUCX | FWWMX / NMUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.00 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.00 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.486 | 4.562 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 248M | 87,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | 10.31 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.19 | 16.13 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.07 | -35.76 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -28.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers