Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NMULX
FWWMX vs NMULX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NMULX
FWWMX vs NMULX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NMULX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NMULX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NMULX (246M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NMULX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NMULX (0.02). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NMULX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NMULX (20 years). NMULX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NMULX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMULX: FWWMX (250) vs NMULX (1000000). NMULX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NMULX (-31.16).
| FWWMX | NMULX | FWWMX / NMULX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 6.319 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 246M | 88,618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.02 | 5,967% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.89 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 24.38 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -31.16 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -19.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers