Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NMULX
FWWMX vs NMULX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NMULX
FWWMX vs NMULX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NMULX (251M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NMULX: FWWMX (1.44) vs NMULX (0.02). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NMULX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NMULX (20 years). NMULX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NMULX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMULX: FWWMX (250) vs NMULX (1000000). NMULX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.52 vs. FWWMX (5.76). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. NMULX (-29.09).
| FWWMX | NMULX | FWWMX / NMULX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.88 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 6.149 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 251M | 87,251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.02 | 5,929% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 12.52 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 20.81 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | -29.09 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -18.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PIEQX | 22.03 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price International Eq Index | |||
| TCMPX | 19.23 | N/A | N/A |
| AMG TimesSquare International SmallCap N | |||
| CAVYX | 18.53 | N/A | N/A |
| SEI Catholic Values Equity Y (SCVT) | |||
| PRUFX | 112.35 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I | |||
| JPVRX | 22.71 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Developed International ValueR5 | |||