Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NRSRX
FWWMX vs NRSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NRSRX
FWWMX vs NRSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NRSRX (4.25B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NRSRX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NRSRX (0.11). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NRSRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NRSRX (13 years). NRSRX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRSRX (10.00). NRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: NRSRX (0) vs FWWMX (250). NRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.20 vs. FWWMX (8.11). NRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.93 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | NRSRX | FWWMX / NRSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 11.320 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.25B | 5,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.11 | 1,271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 25.20 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 62.17 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 33.93 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement