Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBAX
FWWMX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBAX
FWWMX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBAX (6.4B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FWWMX (1.44) vs NSBAX (0.79). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBAX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.69 vs. NSBAX (-2.66). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.69 vs. NSBAX (23.88).
| FWWMX | NSBAX | FWWMX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.980 | 0.974 | 409% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.4B | 3,408% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.79 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.69 | -2.66 | -252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.65 | 20.08 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.69 | 23.88 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement