Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBAX
FWWMX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBAX
FWWMX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NSBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NSBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBAX (6.18B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NSBAX (0.76). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBAX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NSBAX (-6.11). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NSBAX (22.39).
| FWWMX | NSBAX | FWWMX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 1.039 | 434% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.18B | 3,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.76 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -6.11 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 20.43 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 22.39 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.77 | - |