Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBAX
FWWMX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBAX
FWWMX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NSBAX (6.34B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FWWMX (1.42) vs NSBAX (0.77). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBAX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. NSBAX (-0.87). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.60 vs. NSBAX (24.31).
| FWWMX | NSBAX | FWWMX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.016 | 2.453 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 6.34B | 3,454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.77 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -0.87 | -810% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.00 | 18.67 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.60 | 24.31 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement