Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBCX (6.37B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWWMX (1.42) vs NSBCX (0.08). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. NSBCX (-1.95). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.16 vs. NSBCX (19.47).
| FWWMX | NSBCX | FWWMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.623 | 3.226 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.37B | 3,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.08 | 1,713% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | -1.95 | -386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.19 | 22.49 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 19.47 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement