Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NSBCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBCX (6.18B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NSBCX (0.08). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NSBCX (-6.84). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NSBCX (17.85).
| FWWMX | NSBCX | FWWMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 0.506 | 890% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.18B | 3,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.08 | 1,707% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -6.84 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 17.69 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 17.85 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers