Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBCX (6.34B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NSBCX (0.14). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. NSBCX (-1.40). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.14 vs. NSBCX (20.23).
| FWWMX | NSBCX | FWWMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | -0.951 | -139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.34B | 3,437% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.14 | 974% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | -1.40 | -500% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 18.93 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.14 | 20.23 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement