Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBCX
FWWMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NSBCX (6.47B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NSBCX (0.14). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. NSBCX (-0.56). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. NSBCX (20.66).
| FWWMX | NSBCX | FWWMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.66 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 0.134 | 4,163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 6.47B | 3,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.14 | 974% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | -0.56 | -1,435% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 20.56 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 20.66 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.46 | - |