Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBFX
FWWMX vs NSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBFX
FWWMX vs NSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBFX (6.37B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: FWWMX (1.42) vs NSBFX (1.04). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBFX (13 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. NSBFX (-0.78). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.16 vs. NSBFX (26.26).
| FWWMX | NSBFX | FWWMX / NSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.61 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.61 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.623 | 3.973 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.37B | 3,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.04 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | -0.78 | -971% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.19 | 26.72 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 26.26 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement