Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBFX
FWWMX vs NSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBFX
FWWMX vs NSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NSBFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBFX (6.18B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NSBFX (1.04). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBFX (13 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NSBFX (-5.72). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NSBFX (24.52).
| FWWMX | NSBFX | FWWMX / NSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.61 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.61 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 1.286 | 350% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.18B | 3,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.04 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -5.72 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 21.72 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 24.52 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers