Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBFX
FWWMX vs NSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBFX
FWWMX vs NSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NSBFX (6.47B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NSBFX (1.12). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBFX (13 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. NSBFX (0.63). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. NSBFX (27.49).
| FWWMX | NSBFX | FWWMX / NSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.61 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.61 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 0.620 | 899% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 6.47B | 3,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.12 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 0.63 | 1,278% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 24.70 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 27.49 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement