Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NSBRX
FWWMX vs NSBRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NSBRX
FWWMX vs NSBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NSBRX (6.34B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NSBRX: FWWMX (1.42) vs NSBRX (1.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NSBRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NSBRX (20 years). NSBRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBRX (12.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBRX: FWWMX (250) vs NSBRX (100000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. NSBRX (-0.63). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.60 vs. NSBRX (25.84).
| FWWMX | NSBRX | FWWMX / NSBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.66 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.66 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.016 | 2.609 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 6.34B | 3,454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.00 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -0.63 | -1,120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.00 | 19.54 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.60 | 25.84 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement