Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NWABX
FWWMX vs NWABX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NWABX
FWWMX vs NWABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWABX (1.53B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NWABX: FWWMX (1.40) vs NWABX (0.58). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NWABX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NWABX (8 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: FWWMX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.56 vs. NWABX (-5.72). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. NWABX (-0.51).
| FWWMX | NWABX | FWWMX / NWABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.079 | 6.172 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.53B | 14,276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.58 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.56 | -5.72 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 11.41 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.95 | -0.51 | -6,463% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WBENX | 21.61 | 0.70 | +3.35% |
| William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth N | |||
| PJRAX | 11.20 | 0.17 | +1.54% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq A | |||
| RLGYX | 12.15 | 0.12 | +1.00% |
| Russell Inv Global Equity Y | |||
| VBIAX | 54.52 | 0.43 | +0.79% |
| Vanguard Balanced Index Adm | |||
| BLRAX | 12.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A | |||