Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NWABX
FWWMX vs NWABX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NWABX
FWWMX vs NWABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NWABX (1.54B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NWABX: FWWMX (1.44) vs NWABX (0.54). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NWABX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NWABX (8 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: FWWMX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. NWABX (-8.51). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. NWABX (-2.99).
| FWWMX | NWABX | FWWMX / NWABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 7.837 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 1.54B | 14,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.54 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | -8.51 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 11.90 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | -2.99 | -1,032% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers