Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NWABX
FWWMX vs NWABX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NWABX
FWWMX vs NWABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NWABX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NWABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWABX (1.73B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NWABX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NWABX (0.53). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NWABX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NWABX (8 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: FWWMX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NWABX (-13.35). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NWABX (-6.48).
| FWWMX | NWABX | FWWMX / NWABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.59 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 6.787 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.73B | 12,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.53 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -13.35 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 11.60 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -6.48 | -466% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers