Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NWAMX
FWWMX vs NWAMX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NWAMX
FWWMX vs NWAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWAMX (920M). NWAMX (1.42) and FWWMX (1.40) have matching dividends . FWWMX was incepted earlier than NWAMX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NWAMX (39 years). NWAMX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NWAMX (8.73). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: FWWMX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). NWAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.51 vs. FWWMX (8.15). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. NWAMX (10.46).
| FWWMX | NWAMX | FWWMX / NWAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.70 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.79 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 13.636 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 920M | 23,696% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.42 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 18.51 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 32.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 10.46 | 290% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement