Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NWAMX
FWWMX vs NWAMX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NWAMX
FWWMX vs NWAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NWAMX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NWAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWAMX (951M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NWAMX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NWAMX (1.30). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NWAMX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NWAMX (39 years). NWAMX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NWAMX (8.73). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAMX: FWWMX (250) vs NWAMX (2500). NWAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NWAMX (10.47).
| FWWMX | NWAMX | FWWMX / NWAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.70 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.79 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 17.239 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 951M | 22,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.30 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 13.60 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 30.33 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 10.47 | 288% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers