Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs NWFAX
FWWMX vs NWFAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs NWFAX
FWWMX vs NWFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. NWFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and NWFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWFAX (1.73B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than NWFAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs NWFAX (0.24). FWWMX was incepted earlier than NWFAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs NWFAX (28 years). NWFAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). NWFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWFAX: FWWMX (250) vs NWFAX (2000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NWFAX (-12.85). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. NWFAX (-6.07).
| FWWMX | NWFAX | FWWMX / NWFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.88 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.92 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 6.571 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.73B | 12,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.24 | 591% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -12.85 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 11.96 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -6.07 | -497% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers