Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs PAXLX
FWWMX vs PAXLX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs PAXLX
FWWMX vs PAXLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. PAXLX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and PAXLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PAXLX (374M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than PAXLX: FWWMX (1.42) vs PAXLX (0.32). FWWMX was incepted earlier than PAXLX: FWWMX (6 years) vs PAXLX (10 years). PAXLX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). PAXLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAXLX: FWWMX (250) vs PAXLX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.51 vs. PAXLX (-17.68). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.47 vs. PAXLX (-20.91).
| FWWMX | PAXLX | FWWMX / PAXLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.98 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.98 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.901 | 5.332 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 374M | 58,289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.32 | 450% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | -17.68 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.32 | -6.51 | -527% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.47 | -20.91 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement