Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs PCAOX
FWWMX vs PCAOX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs PCAOX
FWWMX vs PCAOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. PCAOX (5.38B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than PCAOX: FWWMX (1.40) vs PCAOX (0.07). FWWMX was incepted earlier than PCAOX: FWWMX (6 years) vs PCAOX (16 years). PCAOX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). PCAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.80 vs. FWWMX (29.00). PCAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: PCAOX (0) vs FWWMX (250). PCAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.54 vs. FWWMX (8.11). PCAOX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | PCAOX | FWWMX / PCAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.99 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.99 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 10.496 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 5.38B | 3,981% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.07 | 2,113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 15.54 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 55.92 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 50.55 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement