Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs PCEKX
FWWMX vs PCEKX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs PCEKX
FWWMX vs PCEKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. PCEKX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and PCEKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PCEKX (2.16B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than PCEKX: FWWMX (1.41) vs PCEKX (0.92). FWWMX was incepted earlier than PCEKX: FWWMX (6 years) vs PCEKX (8 years). PCEKX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). PCEKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCEKX: FWWMX (250) vs PCEKX (5000000). PCEKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. PCEKX (12.65).
| FWWMX | PCEKX | FWWMX / PCEKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.57 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.57 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 15.697 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 2.16B | 10,097% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.92 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 13.57 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 43.21 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 12.65 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers