Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs PCODX
FWWMX vs PCODX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs PCODX
FWWMX vs PCODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. PCODX (11.4B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than PCODX: FWWMX (1.40) vs PCODX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than PCODX: FWWMX (6 years) vs PCODX (30 years). PCODX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). PCODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCODX: FWWMX (250) vs PCODX (2500). PCODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.72 vs. FWWMX (8.11). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. PCODX (8.36).
| FWWMX | PCODX | FWWMX / PCODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.72 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.76 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 12.318 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 11.4B | 1,877% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 17.72 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 40.78 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 8.36 | 352% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement