Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs PCODX
FWWMX vs PCODX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs PCODX
FWWMX vs PCODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. PCODX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and PCODX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PCODX (10.9B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than PCODX: FWWMX (1.41) vs PCODX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than PCODX: FWWMX (6 years) vs PCODX (30 years). PCODX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). PCODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCODX: FWWMX (250) vs PCODX (2500). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. PCODX (-0.26). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. PCODX (0.54).
| FWWMX | PCODX | FWWMX / PCODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.72 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.76 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 8.138 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 10.9B | 2,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -0.26 | -793% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 27.81 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 0.54 | 5,619% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers