Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RFEBX
FWWMX vs RFEBX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RFEBX
FWWMX vs RFEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RFEBX (173B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RFEBX: FWWMX (1.40) vs RFEBX (0.19). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RFEBX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RFEBX (12 years). RFEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RFEBX (26.00). FWWMX (250) and RFEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.36 vs. FWWMX (8.11). RFEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.97 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | RFEBX | FWWMX / RFEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.08 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.08 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 14.886 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 173B | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.19 | 725% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 24.36 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 61.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 38.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement