Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RFNBX
FWWMX vs RFNBX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RFNBX
FWWMX vs RFNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RFNBX (173B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RFNBX: FWWMX (1.40) vs RFNBX (0.01). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RFNBX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RFNBX (24 years). RFNBX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RFNBX (26.00). FWWMX (250) and RFNBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.98 vs. FWWMX (8.11). RFNBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.35 vs. FWWMX (29.47).
| FWWMX | RFNBX | FWWMX / RFNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.37 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.37 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 14.755 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 173B | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.01 | 10,705% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 23.98 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 60.33 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 37.35 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement