Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RIBEX
FWWMX vs RIBEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RIBEX
FWWMX vs RIBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RIBEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RIBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RIBEX (187B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RIBEX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RIBEX (0.38). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RIBEX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RIBEX (12 years). RIBEX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RIBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX (250) and RIBEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RIBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.43 vs. FWWMX (2.09). RIBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.93 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | RIBEX | FWWMX / RIBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.06 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.06 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 9.550 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 187B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.38 | 370% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 2.43 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 45.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 35.93 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers