Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RICBX
FWWMX vs RICBX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RICBX
FWWMX vs RICBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RICBX (186B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RICBX: FWWMX (1.40) vs RICBX (0.16). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RICBX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RICBX (24 years). RICBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RICBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX (250) and RICBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. RICBX (10.30). RICBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. FWWMX (29.93).
| FWWMX | RICBX | FWWMX / RICBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.36 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.36 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.049 | 7.739 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 186B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.16 | 892% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 10.30 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 45.75 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.93 | 35.92 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers