Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RICBX
FWWMX vs RICBX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RICBX
FWWMX vs RICBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RICBX (184B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RICBX: FWWMX (1.44) vs RICBX (0.13). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RICBX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RICBX (24 years). RICBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RICBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX (250) and RICBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. FWWMX (5.62). RICBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.48 vs. FWWMX (30.89).
| FWWMX | RICBX | FWWMX / RICBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.36 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.36 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.135 | 9.762 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 184B | 119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.13 | 1,102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | 7.42 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.04 | 45.87 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.89 | 37.48 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers