Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RICBX
FWWMX vs RICBX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RICBX
FWWMX vs RICBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RICBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RICBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RICBX (187B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RICBX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RICBX (0.13). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RICBX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RICBX (24 years). RICBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RICBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX (250) and RICBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICBX (2.09) and FWWMX (2.09) have marching annual gain over last year. RICBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | RICBX | FWWMX / RICBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.36 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.36 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 9.342 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 187B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.13 | 1,089% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 2.09 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 43.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 34.12 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers