FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RICBX (184B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RICBX: FWWMX (1.42) vs RICBX (0.13). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RICBX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RICBX (24 years). RICBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RICBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX (250) and RICBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. RICBX (6.30). RICBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.29 vs. FWWMX (31.60).

	FWWMX	RICBX	FWWMX / RICBX
Total Expense Ratio	0.31	1.36	23%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.31	1.36	23%
Fund Existence	6 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	5.016	8.938	56%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	250	250	100%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	219B	184B	119%
Annual Yield % from dividends	1.42	0.13	1,086%
Returns for 1 year	7.00	6.30	111%
Returns for 3 years	28.00	40.13	70%
Returns for 5 years	31.60	36.29	87%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	90.28	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
BSPAX	870.28	6.09	+0.70%
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor A
MFWIX	18.27	-0.05	-0.27%
MFS Global Total Return I
HAMVX	34.01	-0.13	-0.38%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Instl
RPFRX	41.92	-0.49	-1.16%
Davis Real Estate A
HIINX	59.95	-0.71	-1.17%
Harbor International Investor