Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RICFX
FWWMX vs RICFX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RICFX
FWWMX vs RICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RICFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RICFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RICFX (187B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RICFX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RICFX (1.04). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RICFX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RICFX (24 years). RICFX (0.32) and FWWMX (0.31) have similar cost to investors . RICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX (250) and RICFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.24 vs. FWWMX (2.09). RICFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.21 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | RICFX | FWWMX / RICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.32 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.32 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 10.135 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 187B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.04 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 3.24 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 48.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 40.21 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers