Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RICHX
FWWMX vs RICHX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RICHX
FWWMX vs RICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RICHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RICHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RICHX (187B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RICHX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RICHX (0.95). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RICHX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RICHX (11 years). RICHX (0.41) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX (250) and RICHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. FWWMX (2.09). RICHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | RICHX | FWWMX / RICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.41 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.41 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 10.045 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 187B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.95 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 3.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 48.17 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 39.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers