Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RLUSX
FWWMX vs RLUSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RLUSX
FWWMX vs RLUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RLUSX commentary
Sep 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and RLUSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RLUSX (77.6M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RLUSX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RLUSX (0.54). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RLUSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RLUSX (12 years). RLUSX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX (32.00) and RLUSX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLUSX: FWWMX (250) vs RLUSX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. RLUSX (2.70). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.55 vs. RLUSX (16.43).
| FWWMX | RLUSX | FWWMX / RLUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.70 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.78 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.850 | 8.638 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 77.6M | 280,928% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.54 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 2.70 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.74 | 27.63 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.55 | 16.43 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement