Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RSDQX
FWWMX vs RSDQX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RSDQX
FWWMX vs RSDQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RSDQX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RSDQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSDQX (3.45B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RSDQX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RSDQX (0.79). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RSDQX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RSDQX (7 years). RSDQX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RSDQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSDQX: FWWMX (250) vs RSDQX (1000000). RSDQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.98 vs. FWWMX (2.18). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.87 vs. RSDQX (12.75).
| FWWMX | RSDQX | FWWMX / RSDQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.228 | 7.847 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.45B | 6,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.79 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 3.98 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.81 | 26.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.87 | 12.75 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement