Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RSDQX
FWWMX vs RSDQX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RSDQX
FWWMX vs RSDQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RSDQX (3.47B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RSDQX: FWWMX (1.40) vs RSDQX (0.83). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RSDQX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RSDQX (7 years). RSDQX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RSDQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSDQX: FWWMX (250) vs RSDQX (1000000). RSDQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. FWWMX (8.11). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. RSDQX (18.77).
| FWWMX | RSDQX | FWWMX / RSDQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 6.186 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 3.47B | 6,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.83 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 13.06 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 27.33 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 18.77 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement