Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RSEAX
FWWMX vs RSEAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RSEAX
FWWMX vs RSEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSEAX (3.05B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RSEAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs RSEAX (0.44). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RSEAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RSEAX (14 years). RSEAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RSEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). RSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: RSEAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). RSEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. FWWMX (8.15). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. RSEAX (9.14).
| FWWMX | RSEAX | FWWMX / RSEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.08 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.18 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 8.517 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.05B | 7,159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.44 | 317% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 10.50 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 31.79 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 9.14 | 332% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement