Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RSECX
FWWMX vs RSECX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RSECX
FWWMX vs RSECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RSECX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RSECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSECX (3.06B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RSECX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RSECX (0.08). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RSECX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RSECX (14 years). RSECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: RSECX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. RSECX (1.21). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. RSECX (4.30).
| FWWMX | RSECX | FWWMX / RSECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.83 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.93 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 10.362 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.06B | 7,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.08 | 1,820% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 1.21 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 26.55 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 4.30 | 701% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers