Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RSECX
FWWMX vs RSECX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RSECX
FWWMX vs RSECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSECX (3.05B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RSECX: FWWMX (1.40) vs RSECX (0.08). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RSECX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RSECX (14 years). RSECX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). RSECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). RSECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: RSECX (0) vs FWWMX (250). RSECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. FWWMX (8.15). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. RSECX (5.07).
| FWWMX | RSECX | FWWMX / RSECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.83 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.93 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 8.155 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.05B | 7,159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.08 | 1,767% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 9.32 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 28.16 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 5.07 | 598% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement