Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RTDAX
FWWMX vs RTDAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RTDAX
FWWMX vs RTDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RTDAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RTDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RTDAX (280M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RTDAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RTDAX (0.58). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RTDAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RTDAX (8 years). RTDAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RTDAX (25.00). RTDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: RTDAX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. RTDAX (-13.28). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. RTDAX (-12.88).
| FWWMX | RTDAX | FWWMX / RTDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 12.778 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 280M | 77,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.58 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -13.28 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | -5.21 | -580% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -12.88 | -234% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers