Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RTDCX
FWWMX vs RTDCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RTDCX
FWWMX vs RTDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. RTDCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and RTDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RTDCX (280M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RTDCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs RTDCX (0.22). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RTDCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RTDCX (8 years). RTDCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RTDCX (25.00). RTDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: RTDCX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. RTDCX (-13.49). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. RTDCX (-14.09).
| FWWMX | RTDCX | FWWMX / RTDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.64 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.64 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 12.151 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 280M | 77,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.22 | 628% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -13.49 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | -6.43 | -470% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -14.09 | -214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers