Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs RTDSX
FWWMX vs RTDSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs RTDSX
FWWMX vs RTDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RTDSX (293M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than RTDSX: FWWMX (1.40) vs RTDSX (0.87). FWWMX was incepted earlier than RTDSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs RTDSX (11 years). RTDSX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RTDSX (25.00). RTDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: RTDSX (0) vs FWWMX (250). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. RTDSX (-3.68). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. RTDSX (-8.15).
| FWWMX | RTDSX | FWWMX / RTDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 11.846 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 293M | 73,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.87 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | -3.68 | -220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | -0.51 | -6,513% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | -8.15 | -362% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement