Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SCDGX
FWWMX vs SCDGX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SCDGX
FWWMX vs SCDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SCDGX (5.05B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SCDGX: FWWMX (1.42) vs SCDGX (0.57). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SCDGX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SCDGX (97 years). SCDGX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SCDGX (27.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCDGX: FWWMX (250) vs SCDGX (2500). SCDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.35 vs. FWWMX (7.53). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.16 vs. SCDGX (19.13).
| FWWMX | SCDGX | FWWMX / SCDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 97 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.623 | 14.033 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.05B | 4,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.57 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 12.35 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.19 | 42.12 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 19.13 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement