Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SCDGX
FWWMX vs SCDGX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SCDGX
FWWMX vs SCDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. SCDGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and SCDGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SCDGX (5.02B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SCDGX: FWWMX (1.41) vs SCDGX (0.56). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SCDGX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SCDGX (97 years). SCDGX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SCDGX (27.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCDGX: FWWMX (250) vs SCDGX (2500). SCDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. SCDGX (18.15).
| FWWMX | SCDGX | FWWMX / SCDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 97 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 13.225 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.02B | 4,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.56 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 7.20 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 39.04 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 18.15 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement