Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SCPAX
FWWMX vs SCPAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SCPAX
FWWMX vs SCPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. SCPAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and SCPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SCPAX (1.24B). SCPAX pays higher dividends than FWWMX: SCPAX (2.76) vs FWWMX (1.41). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SCPAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SCPAX (23 years). SCPAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). SCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCPAX: FWWMX (250) vs SCPAX (100000). SCPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.17 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. SCPAX (6.37).
| FWWMX | SCPAX | FWWMX / SCPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 13.433 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.24B | 17,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 2.76 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.17 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 37.76 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 6.37 | 474% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers