Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SCPIX
FWWMX vs SCPIX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SCPIX
FWWMX vs SCPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SCPIX (1.59B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SCPIX: FWWMX (1.40) vs SCPIX (0.94). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SCPIX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SCPIX (29 years). FWWMX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SCPIX (0.29). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SCPIX (2.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCPIX: FWWMX (250) vs SCPIX (2500). SCPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.19 vs. FWWMX (7.02). SCPIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.31 vs. FWWMX (29.14).
| FWWMX | SCPIX | FWWMX / SCPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.29 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.29 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 9.652 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.59B | 13,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.94 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 21.19 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 55.14 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.14 | 49.31 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 169.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement