Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SCPIX
FWWMX vs SCPIX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SCPIX
FWWMX vs SCPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. SCPIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and SCPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SCPIX (1.59B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SCPIX: FWWMX (1.41) vs SCPIX (0.93). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SCPIX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SCPIX (29 years). FWWMX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SCPIX (0.29). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SCPIX (2.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCPIX: FWWMX (250) vs SCPIX (2500). SCPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.34 vs. FWWMX (2.09). SCPIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.48 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | SCPIX | FWWMX / SCPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.29 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.29 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 10.379 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.59B | 13,676% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.93 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 11.34 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 51.77 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 43.48 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 158.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement