Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SDLAX
FWWMX vs SDLAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SDLAX
FWWMX vs SDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. SDLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and SDLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SDLAX (2.08B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SDLAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs SDLAX (1.34). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SDLAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SDLAX (16 years). SDLAX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SDLAX (19.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SDLAX: FWWMX (250) vs SDLAX (100000). SDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.55 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. SDLAX (-6.73).
| FWWMX | SDLAX | FWWMX / SDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.03 | 1,033% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.67 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 11.245 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 2.08B | 10,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.34 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 3.55 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 9.63 | 314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -6.73 | -448% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers