Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SGICX
FWWMX vs SGICX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SGICX
FWWMX vs SGICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. SGICX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and SGICX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SGICX (196M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SGICX: FWWMX (1.41) vs SGICX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SGICX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SGICX (11 years). SGICX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). SGICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGICX: FWWMX (250) vs SGICX (1000). SGICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. SGICX (-15.99).
| FWWMX | SGICX | FWWMX / SGICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.98 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.98 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 13.115 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 196M | 111,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 8.20 | 369% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -15.99 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers