Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SPINX
FWWMX vs SPINX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SPINX
FWWMX vs SPINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. SPINX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and SPINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SPINX (4.27B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SPINX: FWWMX (1.41) vs SPINX (1.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SPINX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SPINX (13 years). FWWMX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SPINX (0.12). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SPINX (5.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPINX: FWWMX (250) vs SPINX (100000). SPINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. SPINX (5.88).
| FWWMX | SPINX | FWWMX / SPINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.05 | 620% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.12 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 11.725 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.27B | 5,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.00 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 5.17 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 18.40 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 5.88 | 513% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 128.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement