Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SPUSX
FWWMX vs SPUSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SPUSX
FWWMX vs SPUSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. SPUSX (446M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SPUSX: FWWMX (1.44) vs SPUSX (0.65). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SPUSX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SPUSX (8 years). SPUSX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SPUSX (18.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPUSX: FWWMX (250) vs SPUSX (1000). SPUSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. FWWMX (5.76). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. SPUSX (27.36).
| FWWMX | SPUSX | FWWMX / SPUSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.65 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.84 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 14.005 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 446M | 49,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.65 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 15.49 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 34.15 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 27.36 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement