Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs SUPCX
FWWMX vs SUPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs SUPCX
FWWMX vs SUPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. SUPCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and SUPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SUPCX (104M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than SUPCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs SUPCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than SUPCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs SUPCX (26 years). SUPCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SUPCX (27.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUPCX: FWWMX (250) vs SUPCX (1000). SUPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. SUPCX (26.28).
| FWWMX | SUPCX | FWWMX / SUPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.48 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.89 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 12.763 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 104M | 209,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 18.82 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 70.92 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 26.28 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement