Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TCEPX
FWWMX vs TCEPX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TCEPX
FWWMX vs TCEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. TCEPX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and TCEPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TCEPX (60.5B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TCEPX: FWWMX (1.41) vs TCEPX (0.94). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TCEPX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TCEPX (17 years). FWWMX (0.31) is less costly to investors than TCEPX (0.19). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TCEPX (7.00). TCEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: TCEPX (0) vs FWWMX (250). TCEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.48 vs. FWWMX (2.09). TCEPX return over 5 years is better than : 66.50 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| FWWMX | TCEPX | FWWMX / TCEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.19 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.19 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 11.733 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 60.5B | 360% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.94 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 14.48 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 71.28 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 66.50 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 256.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement