Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TCEPX
FWWMX vs TCEPX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TCEPX
FWWMX vs TCEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TCEPX (59.6B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TCEPX: FWWMX (1.40) vs TCEPX (0.96). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TCEPX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TCEPX (17 years). FWWMX (0.31) is less costly to investors than TCEPX (0.19). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TCEPX (7.00). TCEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: TCEPX (0) vs FWWMX (250). TCEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.39 vs. FWWMX (8.15). TCEPX return over 5 years is better than : 71.63 vs. FWWMX (30.36).
| FWWMX | TCEPX | FWWMX / TCEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.19 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.19 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 10.344 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 59.6B | 366% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.96 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 25.39 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 74.40 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 71.63 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 270.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement