Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TICRX
FWWMX vs TICRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TICRX
FWWMX vs TICRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. TICRX (6.7B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TICRX: FWWMX (1.40) vs TICRX (0.99). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TICRX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TICRX (20 years). TICRX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TICRX (25.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TICRX: FWWMX (250) vs TICRX (2500). TICRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.59 vs. FWWMX (8.11). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. TICRX (12.95).
| FWWMX | TICRX | FWWMX / TICRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.49 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.49 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 12.988 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 6.7B | 3,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.99 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 17.59 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 31.88 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 12.95 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement