Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TLASX
FWWMX vs TLASX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TLASX
FWWMX vs TLASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TLASX (179M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TLASX: FWWMX (1.40) vs TLASX (0.64). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TLASX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TLASX (3 years). TLASX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). TLASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). TLASX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: TLASX (0) vs FWWMX (250). TLASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. FWWMX (7.02).
| FWWMX | TLASX | FWWMX / TLASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 9.889 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 179M | 121,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.64 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 10.14 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 16.33 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.14 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSPQX | 19.83 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium C | |||
| HLMOX | 9.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv | |||
| BIRIX | 26.38 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Sust Awr Advtg Lg Cp Cr Instl | |||
| GSIQX | 22.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R | |||
| GABPX | 54.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income P | |||