Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TMLCX
FWWMX vs TMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TMLCX
FWWMX vs TMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. TMLCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Buy and TMLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TMLCX (4.66B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TMLCX: FWWMX (1.41) vs TMLCX (0.53). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TMLCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TMLCX (29 years). TMLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TMLCX (14.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLCX: FWWMX (250) vs TMLCX (100000). TMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.70 vs. FWWMX (2.09). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. TMLCX (28.35).
| FWWMX | TMLCX | FWWMX / TMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.506 | 9.958 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.66B | 4,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.53 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 11.70 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 39.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 28.35 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers