Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TMLCX
FWWMX vs TMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TMLCX
FWWMX vs TMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. TMLCX (4.59B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TMLCX: FWWMX (1.44) vs TMLCX (0.60). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TMLCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TMLCX (28 years). TMLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TMLCX (14.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLCX: FWWMX (250) vs TMLCX (100000). TMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. FWWMX (5.76). FWWMX (30.81) and TMLCX (29.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWWMX | TMLCX | FWWMX / TMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.857 | 9.195 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.59B | 4,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.60 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 17.83 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.16 | 36.68 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | 29.57 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement