Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs TMMAX
FWWMX vs TMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs TMMAX
FWWMX vs TMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. TMMAX (568M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than TMMAX: FWWMX (1.40) vs TMMAX (1.06). FWWMX was incepted earlier than TMMAX: FWWMX (6 years) vs TMMAX (18 years). TMMAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). TMMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMMAX: FWWMX (250) vs TMMAX (100000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. TMMAX (-10.82). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. TMMAX (-15.57).
| FWWMX | TMMAX | FWWMX / TMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.572 | 4.939 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 568M | 37,676% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.06 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | -10.82 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | -16.37 | -202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | -15.57 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement