Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs WTRCX
FWWMX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs WTRCX
FWWMX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WTRCX (3.83B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: FWWMX (1.40) vs WTRCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WTRCX (24.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: FWWMX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.56 vs. WTRCX (-0.42). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. WTRCX (-21.50).
| FWWMX | WTRCX | FWWMX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.76 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.079 | 10.129 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.83B | 5,698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.56 | -0.42 | -2,055% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 1.94 | 1,257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.95 | -21.50 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement