Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs WTRCX
FWWMX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs WTRCX
FWWMX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWMX vs. WTRCX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWMX is a Hold and WTRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WTRCX (3.79B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: FWWMX (1.42) vs WTRCX (0.00). FWWMX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: FWWMX (6 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). WTRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: FWWMX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.51 vs. WTRCX (-6.29). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.47 vs. WTRCX (-28.44).
| FWWMX | WTRCX | FWWMX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.76 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.901 | 11.050 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.79B | 5,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | -6.29 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.32 | 3.15 | 1,091% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.47 | -28.44 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement