Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs GIRPX
FWWNX vs GIRPX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs GIRPX
FWWNX vs GIRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GIRPX (3.65B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: GIRPX (1.67) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than GIRPX: FWWNX (6 years) vs GIRPX (16 years). GIRPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: GIRPX (0) vs FWWNX (250). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.34 vs. FWWNX (19.59). GIRPX return over 5 years is better than : 21.74 vs. FWWNX (15.81).
| FWWNX | GIRPX | FWWNX / GIRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.23 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.686 | 24.843 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 3.65B | 2,484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.67 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.59 | 44.34 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.95 | 80.74 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | 21.74 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement